About three weeks ago, I was watching television with my father, and we saw a preview for a new film called In Time which caught our attention. It’s this dystopian movie where everybody stops aging after age 25 and is forced to die instantly one year after that, unless they can earn extra time to live. There is no limit on how much time can, in theory, be stockpiled, which means someone could conceivably live forever. Time is used as a currency (managed by a sinister figure called the Timekeeper) and is the tool by which the rich dominate the poor – by hoarding all the time in the world and simply outliving those who would oppose them.
“That sounds like an interesting concept,” said my dad. “But I don’t want to watch some stupid movie with Justin Timberlake in it. I wonder if it’s based on a book? I’d read a book about this.”
I told him that it was very possible, and that I’d look into it. After all, many Hollywood films are born when a producer hears about a good book and buys the rights to it. I made a quick search on Wikipedia, I found the film, and was stunned to discover that it was not simply based on a piece of written work, but in fact it was subject to a lawsuit by Harlan Ellison, the famed speculative fiction writer, for plagiarism. The work in question? Not a novel, but a short story, entitled “Repent, Harlequin! Said the Ticktockman“.
I had never heard of this story before, and so I quickly found it in the Short Story Collection here at the library. Despite the fact that it is only several pages long, the similarities are remarkable. The story is set in a civilization built entirely around the concept of being on time, where people pay their taxes according to the sum total of how late they’ve been during the previous year, and the government has the power to “turn off” individuals who misuse more time than they’ve got left in their lives. The anti-hero of the tale is the Harlequin, a man who, according to Ellison, “wasn’t much to begin with, except a man who had no sense of time.” More I dare not reveal to you, as the story is more delightful the less you know, except perhaps I should say that it contains one of the most delicious pieces of prose involving jellybeans ever to grace the English language.
In the end, Harlan Ellison dropped the suit against the film In Time on the condition that his name be put into the film credits, and it seems proper that it should be. The movie obviously drew on “Repent, Harlequin!” for inspiration and arguably more than that. This tale is especially relevant in today’s political and economic climate, as people run around and grumble and feel frustrated that the world just refuses to spin the right way for “the ninety-nine percent”, as the Occupiers have been saying; it may make you wonder what a Harlequin might be able to accomplish today if only they had enough jellybeans.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.